In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all make sure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal hasn't yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then find further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is actually a legislation that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to get more info scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Any court may possibly search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the uncovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more